Intel equvalient of amd ryzen master 1080p#
Intel equvalient of amd ryzen master upgrade#
Intel equvalient of amd ryzen master Pc#

Maybe not so much for gamers, but definitely for content creators, programmers and the like. The AM4 platform is currently plagued with problems, but its value is undeniable.

Intel equvalient of amd ryzen master Pc#

Summary:įor content creators and livestreamers: The Ryis the better buy thanks to its stellar multithreading and decent gaming performance.įor pure/competitive gamers: If you only use your PC for gaming and web browsing, the i7-7700K, or even the i5-7600K, would be a better recommendation. This thread on the Anandtech forums delves a bit deeper into this, but to sum it up: faster RAM speeds play an important role in gaming performance on Ryzen processors. It is also important to consider that the performance of the AM4 platform is heavily dependent on RAM speed. A Ryoverclocked to 4.0 Ghz can pull up to 90 more watts than an i7-7700K overclocked to 4.8 Ghz, which is a very conservative overclock on the Intel CPU. Power consumption, on the other hand doesn’t scale very well when overclocked. This means that at that clockrate, all three Ryzen 7 CPUs perform within 1-2% of each other. As you can see in the benchmarks from both GamersNexus and PCPer, the 1700 can be manually overclocked to around 3.9-4.0 Ghz, which is around the maximum for all Ryzen 7 CPUs. There is one very interesting part about the Ryzen 7 1700, though: overclocking.

Intel equvalient of amd ryzen master 1080p#

The i7-7700K struggles with 1080p streaming and encoding at the same time, but the Rybarely drops any frames. Livestreamers will benefit from using the Ryover the Intel equivalent because software-encoding on the CPU gives noticeably improved picture quality over GPU-based encoding (for instance NVENC). For pure gaming though, single-thread and higher clock performance is still king. The reference laptop we’ll look at in this article is the Lenovo Legion 7, as one of the very few models available in both Intel and AMD variants, both paired with a full-power RTX 3080 165W Nvidia GPU. Gaming performance isn’t anything to scuff about, especially for an 8-core 16-thread CPU that beats the i7 7700K in almost all non-gaming benchmarks. GamersNexus show this very well in their review.

Intel equvalient of amd ryzen master upgrade#

In workstation environments, for instance video and image editing, programming, and file conversion, the Ryis faster than Intel’s i7-7700K. I have been studying up on the next motherboard upgrade and I think the Ryzen Master has been an eye opener. Looking at the benchmarks, nothing has changed compared to the other Ryzen CPUs. Today we will take a look at how AMD’s cheapest Ryzen 7 offering, the $330 Ryzen 7 1700, compares to Intel’s price equivalent: the $340 i7-7700K. In our previous articles we talked about the launch of AMD’s new Ryzen 7 CPUs, built a few systems with these new processors ( here, here, and here) and compared the Ryzen 7 1800X and 1700X to their respective competitors in terms of price. Otherwise, all these chips are basically the same, including their ability to overclock. The clockspeeds are also lower, with the 1700 working in a range of 3.0 to 3.7 Ghz, with the TDP set at 65 W. Unlike the X-series CPUs though, the 1700 only has an XFR (extended frequency range) of 50 Mhz, whereas both the 1800X and 1700X can boost up to 100 Mhz higher on a single a core. However, for a purely gaming system, you'd have to go with Intel given the lead the Core i3-8100 has at a near-identical price point.The Ryis - just as the 1800X and 1700X - an 8-core 16-thread processor. In this light, for a general purpose system, AMD would get my vote with the Ryzen 3 1300X. Intel has failed to deal a knockout blow to AMD as it's clear from the benchmarks that in many content creation tests the AMD Ryzen 3 1300X is either faster as stock speed, or can be made faster than the Core i3-8100 courtesy of a sneaky overclock, which of course can't be applied to the Intel CPU in any significant way as it has a locked multiplier.ĪMD was, therefore, faster in HandBrake, PCMark 10's photo editing test and Cinebench and wasn't far off Intel in Ashes of the Singularity and Fallout 4 either. At stock speed, the AMD CPU was more power frugal under load than the Intel Core i3-8100 though.Īs was the case with the Core i7-8700K, there is no clear winner. If youre using it, you should act quickly. Overclocking was always going to add more heat and power consumption to the equation so it's no surprise to see the overclocked Ryzen 3 drawing the most power here although most people don't worry about this. A dangerous vulnerability was found in AMDs Ryzen Master software. Total system power consumption Antony Leather